Last edited by Faera
Thursday, May 7, 2020 | History

8 edition of Intellectual property and theories of justice found in the catalog.

Intellectual property and theories of justice

Intellectual property and theories of justice

  • 391 Want to read
  • 3 Currently reading

Published by Palgrave Macmillan in Basingstoke [England], New York .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Intellectual property,
  • Intellectual property -- Moral and ethical aspects

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographical references and index.

    Statementedited by Axel Gosseries, Alain Marciano and Alain Strowel.
    ContributionsGosseries, Axel., Marciano, Alain., Strowel, Alain.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsK1401 .I5813 2008
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxi, 277 p. :
    Number of Pages277
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL23041584M
    ISBN 100230007090
    ISBN 109780230007093
    LC Control Number2008021224

    Intellectual Property: General Theories discussion transcends the law of any particular nation, the statutory and doctrinal examples are drawn principally from the particularities of the Unites States intellectual property regimes. A. Utilitarian/Economic Theories of Intellectual Property. It is true that temporal limitation is applicable to intellectual property. Intellectual property is most of the time limited in time as to the protection accorded by law. This theory may be justifiable for corporeal ownership in which its existence may be for indefinite period of time.

    Robert Nozick in his famous book Anarchy, State and Utopia () responded to, in part, John Rawls’ distribution theory as articulated in the latter’s celebrated book A Theory of Justice () with the former’s entitlement theory. Nozick calls Rawls’ distribution theory a patterned : Salahuddin A. Alain Marciano is the author of Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice ( avg rating, 1 rating, 0 reviews, published ), Law and Economics i /5.

    The analysis draws on the history of intellectual property, legal materials, the work of Grotius, Pufendorf, Locke, Marx and Hegel, as well as economic, sociological and legal theory. The book is designed to be accessible to specialists in a number of fields as well as students. This book explains China’s intellectual property perspective in the context of European theories, through a critical examination of intellectual property theory and practice focused on China’s compliance with the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).Brand: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.


Share this book
You might also like
Aims and objectives of Uganda Human Rights Activists.

Aims and objectives of Uganda Human Rights Activists.

Regional development

Regional development

Direct Decent

Direct Decent

Retail Sales Tax

Retail Sales Tax

Christians and Muslims Together

Christians and Muslims Together

Green Monday

Green Monday

Analysis of expression of a member of the Brassica oleracea self-incompatability gene family

Analysis of expression of a member of the Brassica oleracea self-incompatability gene family

Drying and processing of materials by means of conditioned air

Drying and processing of materials by means of conditioned air

The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent

The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the Near Continent

A rare soul strengthning [sic] and comforting cordial, for old and young Christians

A rare soul strengthning [sic] and comforting cordial, for old and young Christians

New Mexico Airport System Plan, 1990

New Mexico Airport System Plan, 1990

INI322 COURSE NOTES - FIRST FEMINIST...

INI322 COURSE NOTES - FIRST FEMINIST...

Intellectual property and theories of justice Download PDF EPUB FB2

'This book of readings on intellectual property is unusual in three respects: the international cast of the contributors, the widening of the focus of analysis to include not only law and economics but also philosophy, and the decision to examine both theoretical questions and concrete practical questions.4/5(1).

By: Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice [-Palgrave Macmillan-] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. By: Intellectual Property and Theories of JusticeAuthor: Palgrave Macmillan.

'This book of readings on intellectual property is unusual in three respects: the international cast of the contributors, the widening of the focus of analysis to include not only law and economics but also philosophy, and the decision to examine both theoretical questions and concrete practical questions.

Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the question 'Can intellectual property rights be fair?' What differentiates intellectual from real property.

Should libertarians or Rawlsians defend IP rights. What's wrong with free-riding. How can incentives be taken into account by theories of justice. Description: This volume provides the first systematic exploration of intellectual property and theories of justice from a philosophical perspective.

The book covers the diversity of relevant theories of justice (Lockean, Rawlsian, etc.) and touches on a wide variety of the practical issues related to intellectual property (access to drugs in the third world, traditional. Shubha Ghosh is currently Professor of Law at the University of Wis- consin Law School having been Professor of Law at SUNY, Buffalo, Law School for six years.

He holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Michigan and a JD from Stanford. He writes on intellectual property as well as legal and market theory. Berkeley Electronic Press Selected Works. Intellectual Property Rights and Theories of Justice, Axel Gosseries, Alain Marciano andAlain Strowel (eds).

He holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Michigan and a JD from Stanford. He writes on intellectual property as well as legal and market theory. Franc¸ois Grin is Professor of.

In this volume, fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars and one computer scientist address various facets of the same question: under which conditions (if any) can intellectual property rights be fair. Cited by:   Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice (Gosseries, et al.

) is a much-needed intervention into current debates over intellectual property and social justice, a topic once thought irrelevant to IP. The book considers the theoretical foundations of intellectual-property claims are these rights rooted in Lockean claims, Author: Madhavi Sunder.

Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice (Gosseries, et al. ) is a much-needed intervention into current debates over intellectual property and social justice Author: Madhavi Sunder. Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the question 'Can intellectual property rights be fair?' What differentiates intellectual from real property.

Should libertarians or Rawlsians defend IP rights. What's wrong. The term “intellectual property” refers to a loose cluster of legal doctrines that regulate the uses of different sorts of ideas and insignia. The law of copyright protects various “original forms of expression,” including novels, movies, musical compositions, and computer software Size: KB.

The theory of natural law is derived from the principle that one owns that which one creates by one's own (intellectual) effort and labour At least for South African law, Roman law may be a starting point in the development of a natural-law theory for the recognition of intellectual : Mikhalien Du Bois.

CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): Human gene patents are patents on human genes that have been removed from human bodies and scientifically isolated and manipulated in a laboratory.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the USPTO) has issued thousands of patents on such genes, and patents have also been granted. The analysis draws on the history of intellectual property, legal materials, the work of Grotius, Pufendorf, Locke, Marx and Hegel, as well as economic, sociological and legal : Peter Drahos.

Get this from a library. Intellectual property and theories of justice. [Axel Gosseries; Alain Marciano; Alain Strowel;] -- "In this volume, fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars and one computer scientist address various facets of the same question: under which conditions (if any) can intellectual property.

A decade ago, Professor William Fisher, of Harvard University, made a challenging attempt to answer “yes”, in a book chapter entitled “Theories of Intellectual Property”. While never quite distinguishing between a philosophy, an Cited by: 1.

Madhavi Sunder, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 'This book of readings on intellectual property is unusual in three respects: the international cast of the contributors, the widening of the focus of analysis to include not only law and economics but also philosophy, and the decision to examine both theoretical questions and concrete practical questions.

Social planning theory and its jurisprudential aspect: The last of the four approaches says that, property rights in general – and intellectual-property rights in particular – can and should be shaped so as to help foster the achievement of a just and attractive culture.

justice grounds. IP rights surely have an effect on distributive justice, but these rights are defensible nonetheless. Put simply, IP is fair. A just society awards exclusive property rights to creators, and also limits and structures those rights in a way consistent with overall distributive justice concerns.

Time- limited rights, public- facingCited by: Get this from a library! Intellectual property and theories of justice. [Axel Gosseries; Alain Marciano; Alain Strowel;] -- Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the questions Can intellectual property rights be fair?

What differentiates intellectual from real property? Should libertarians or.CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): More than a quarter-century ago property scholars interrupted the hegemony of a law and economics discourse focused exclusively on efficiency with broader theories about property and social relations.

As the New Jersey Supreme Court declared in in the historic case of State v.